
"Movies rise and beat books down,
for we are easily aesthetically pleased.
Five days of text quickly delivered,
in but half an hour, with ease.
A stranger's vision mindlessly devoured,
why put in the effort to weave our own?
We abandon what so long kept us empowered
If only Hopkins had known."
Performance is my business. I read books every day of my life as far back as I could remember. The stories and details always remained vivid in my mind, partially due to their memorable story lines and intense character development. But this was mostly due to the grand symphonies of image, sound, and feeling I composed in my mind to color each and every flick of the author's pen.

Me at a college speech/literary interpretation competition.
Since my first speech and acting competition in seventh grade, I realized I had an incredible passion for bringing those organized marks on paper I so loved to life.
So why would I stand opposed to the performance of literature versus it's study? Society.
Hopkins laments that poems "bear the marks of having been meant for the whispered, not even whispered, merely mental performance"(letter to brother, hopkins), and obviously believed that they were actually "originally meant for either singing or reciting"(letter to brother, hopkins). He was upset by the fact that mental recitation had taken over in place of oral presentation. I believe our modern-day situation is quite opposite of the one Hopkins faced. As expressed in the poem above, I believe that performed literature has come to a point where it has replaced text. The most beautiful thing about poetry, in my opinion, is the fact that it requires creativity from both the reader as well as the writer.
A book can mean so many different things to each reader.
Although the poet wrote these words, they may mean something completely different to me. A poem is an endless source of inspiration that creates a variety of beautiful paintings on the canvas of each individual mind.
I used to play with the younger kids down the street until their moms came home from work. When they were too much for me to handle, I'd whip out watercolors and pieces of cardboard for everyone, and then read them a poem or tell them a story. Sometimes, I gave each of them their own poem to read. I'd write on their cardboard and instruct each child to decorate the poem by painting what they saw or where the story was taking place. Never did I get two paintings that were anything alike. Not only were the visuals different, but the emotions and feelings portrayed by these photos were different.

The same colors and words channeled through different minds can be so unique.
That's what we've lost through performance. The ability to mold and reinterpret words. When I'm reading a poem, I can stop to digest and muse. When I'm listening, I don't get that grace period. Whenever I listen to songs, I hate not having the lyrics in front of me, because I want to retrace the words, the emotions, and the images at my leisure. I absolutely love hearing a musical rendition, but it should not serve to replace textual study.
In a way, Hopkins and I both agree. Neither the mind nor the tongue should replace the other. We must develop a healthy relationship between performance and text in order to make the most out of literature. Personally, I prefer to read and interpret without influence before hearing a rendition or recitation of a poem. I believe Professor Bump must feel the same way, as it is no coincidence that his instructions urge us to "READ WITH [OUR] EYES AND THEN COMPARE TO A PERFORMANCE"(assignment, bump).
Having read and then listened to each of Hopkins' poems, I affirm my prior belief that benefits come from both forms of media. When first reading "The Windhover", "Brute beauty and valour and act, oh, air, pride, plume"(hopkins), was one of my favorite lines. In my mental performance it was highlighted, and I associated a beautiful image with it. Upon hearing the audio version,
"shéer plód makes plough down sillion
Shine, and blue-bleak embers, ah my dear,
Fall, gall themselves, and gash gold-vermillion" sounded so musical and splendid. The rhythm I read it with in my head did not do the lines justice. I appreciated them more afterwards. There were still many parts that I read differently and liked better in my head, however.
I must say, however, that I much preferred my own performance of "Spring". The audio version was a bit too drawn out in my opinion. Maybe it's just my impatience speaking, though.
Either way, we must learn to balance forms of media and leave ourselves open to interpretation from multiple sources.
Conclusively, I'd like to visually depict the beauty of interpretation by discussing several artistic interpretations of the song "Your Guardian Angel" by The Red Jumpsuit Apparatus. This song meant a lot to me a year ago. It truly embodied the way I felt about someone very close to me. I felt as if the notes played straight from my soul, singing the most honest promise I'd ever made. I was obviously not alone, because there were several renditions of this song before the official music video very recently came out. Many songs are equally moving, but they do not have so many artistic renditions because the official music videos are instantly released and there is no longer space to fill.
Here are the lyrics:
"When I see your smile
Tears run down my face I can't replace
And now that I'm strong I have figured out
How this world turns cold and it breaks through my soul
And I know I'll find deep inside me I can be the one
I will never let you fall
I'll stand up with you forever
I'll be there for you through it all
Even if saving you sends me to heaven
It's okay. It's okay. It's okay.
Seasons are changing
And waves are crashing
And stars are falling all for us
Days grow longer and nights grow shorter
I can show you I'll be the one
I will never let you fall (let you fall)
I'll stand up with you forever
I'll be there for you through it all (through it all)
Even if saving you sends me to heaven
Cuz you're my, you're my, my, my true love, my whole heart
Please don't throw that away
Cuz I'm here for you
Please don't walk away and
Please tell me you'll stay, stay
Use me as you will
Pull my strings just for a thrill
And I know I'll be okay
Though my skies are turning gray
I will never let you fall
I'll stand up with you forever
I'll be there for you through it all
Even if saving you sends me to heaven."
Lyrics only, this sounds like a very sad song to me. As if the singer is tortured by the immense amount of love he holds for this person.
Adding sound, I come to realize that the singer is tortured, but that this torture brings him great relief, stability, and joy rather than torment.
Here is the original video/audio performance:
The visual performance is obviously lacking. Images could be so much more powerful.
The text alone was so powerful for some that individuals created videos of text only:
Others set the audio in a familiar situation. Here is a video comprised of clips from the famous movie "A Walk to Remember" and set to the tune of "Your Guardian Angel". This rendition gives the lyrics faces, and makes the song much more moving and memorable as the emotional power of the movie and the song are combined.
Others created their own footage and story. This clip twists the lyrics around and makes it seem as if the singer has actually passed away, yet still watches over his beloved. This is a beautiful rendition, in my opinion, and very comforting for those who may be going through something like this.
Lastly, many people chose to cover the audio track itself. This version has no vocals, but I think it is amazing.
This version has a full vocal cover (and there were dozens to choose from!)
Now imagine all the interpretations we would never have seen!